In situ morphological characterization of soursop (Annona muricata L.) plants in Manabí, Ecuador

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoque.v11n2.536

Keywords:

Annona, soursop, descriptor, variability, phenotypic.

Abstract

Soursop (Annona muricata L.) germplasm, from the central region of the Ecuadorian littoral, has diverse phenotypic characteristics, which have been little studied. The main objective of this research was to characterize in situ the morphological variability of 60 accessions of soursop. The morphological traits were evaluated using 20 quantitative and 10 qualitative variables of the plant and the fruit. Multivariate statistical methods were used as principal components, hierarchical conglomerate aggregation, discriminant and correlation analysis (Pearson) were performed. Descriptive analysis such as central tendency and dispersion (coefficient of variation, range, mean and standard deviation) were determined for the quantitative data; while frequencies were calculated for qualitative data. In terms of morphological traits, 74 % of the total variability was explained by the fourth component. Three conglomerates of similarity were formed, in which the height, diameter of canopy and fruit number per tree, were the characters of greater contribution for its conformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benavides, G. A. (1997). Caracterización numérica del germoplasma de guanábana (Annona muricata L.) muestreado in situ en el Pacífico y norte de Nicaragua. Nicaragua: Universidad Nacional Agraria-Programa de Recursos Fitogenéticos Nicaragüenses.

Bioversity International y CHERLA. (2008). Descriptores para chirimoyo (Annona cherimola Mill). Bioversity International, Roma, Italia: Proyecto CHERLA, Málaga, España, 51 pp.

Castañeda, S. L. (2014). Evaluación morfológica y molecular de accesiones de anonáceas (Anón, chirimoya y atemoya) en condiciones in situ de las regiones andinas y Caribe colombiano. Agrarias. Tesis de Investigación presentada como requisito parcial para optar al título de Magíster en Ciencias Agrarias, Área de Genética y Fitomejoramiento. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias., 147 pp.

Constance, N., Brisibe, E.A., Nkachukwu, P. y Aniedi, E. (2015). Molecular and morphological marker reveal exploitable diversity in soursop (Annona muricata L.). Industrial Biotechnology Congress Biotechnology. Biomater 5 (2): 41.

Di Rienzo, J. A., Casanoves, F., Balzarini, M. G., González, L., Tablada, M. y Robledo. C. W. (2016). InfoStat versión 2016. Grupo Infostat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina., URL http://www.infostat.com.ar.

Franco, T. L., e Hidalgo, R. (Eds.). (2003). Análisis estadístico de datos de caracterización morfológica de recursos fitogenéticos. Boletín Técnico n.° 8. Cali, Colombia. Instituto Internacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos (IPGRI), 89.

Hernández, V. A. (2013). Caracterización morfológica de recursos fitogenéticos. Revista Biociencias, 2 (3): 113-118.

INAMHI (Instituto Nacional de Metereología y Hidrología). 2014. Anuario Meteorológico n.° 51, 149 pp. Jameel, M.; Mohan, S. y Johnson, D. (Eds.). (2015). Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies”. In Breeding, Biotechnology and Molecular Tools. Vol. 1. USA: Springers International Publishing, 656 pp.

Jemimah, O., Obaineh, M. y Muhammad, A. 2016. Comparative Phytochemistry and Antioxidant Activities of Water and Ethanol Extract of Annona muricata Linn Leaf, Seed and Fruit. Advances in Biological Research. 10 (4): 230-235.

Love, K., y Paull, R. (2011). Soursop. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai at Manoa. UH-CTAHR. F-N-22, 6 pp.

Meza, N., y Bautista, D. (1999). Estimación del área foliar en plantas jovenes de níspero (Manilkara achras (Miller) Fosgber) sometidas a dos ambientes de luz. Bioagro, 11 (1): 24-28.

Miranda, D., Arce, C., Gómez, L., Vasto, D., Arboney, J. y Bravo, A. (2000). Conozcamos el cultivo de Guanábana. Cartilla divulgativa. CORPOICA Regional 6. Caracterización de cultivares de guanábana (Annona muricata L.). Guanábana MIC., 252 pp.

Moreira R. y Héctor E. (2014). Estado actual y perspectivas de desarrollo de la guanábana (Annona muricata L.) como cultivo comercial en el sur de Manabí, Ecuador”. Alternativas. 15 (2), 36-42.

Moreira M. R., Héctor A. E, Uguña. R. F., Franco F. F. y Rodríguez A. D. (2016). Variabilidad físico-química de frutos de guanábana (Annona muricata L.) de una población in situ del sur de Manabí, Ecuador. Agrotecnia de Cuba, 40 (1): 34-46.

Pro Ecuador. “Boletín Mensual de Comercio Exterior-Ministerio de Comercio Exterior. Dirección de Inteligencia Comercial e Inversiones”. 2014. Disponible en: http://www.proecuador.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2014 /04/BOLETIN-MARZO-ABRIL-INAL.pdf. (Consultado: 20 de junio de 2016).

Suratman, A. P., y Mulyani, S. (2015). Assement of genetic diversity among soursop (Annona muricata) populations from Java, Indonesia using RAPD markers. Biodiversitas, 16 (2): 247-253.

Padmini, S. M., Pushpakumara, D. y Samarasekera, R. 2013. Morphological characterization of Soursop (Annona muricata L.) Germplasm in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agriculture Research, 24 (4): 362-374.

Pinto, A. C., Cordeiro, M., Andrade, M., Ferreira, F., Filgueira, H., Alves, R. & Kimpara, D., 2005. Annona species. International Centre for Underutilized Crop. University of Southampton. SO17 IBJ. UK. 268 pp.

Zorofchian, S., Fadaeinasab, M., Nikzad, S., Mohan, G., Mohd, H. & Abdul, Y.H. 2015. “Annona muricata (Annonaceae): A Review of Its Traditional Uses, Isolated Acetogenins and Biological Activities”. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 16:15625-15658. doi: 10.3390/ijms160715625.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-01

How to Cite

Moreira Macías, R. G., Rodríguez, H., Héctor-Ardisana, E., Feicán-Mejía, C., Mestanza Velasco, S. A., & Viera Arroyo, W. (2020). In situ morphological characterization of soursop (Annona muricata L.) plants in Manabí, Ecuador. Enfoque UTE, 11(2), pp. 58–70. https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoque.v11n2.536

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Miscellaneous

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Enfoque UTE

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

The articles and research published by the UTE University are carried out under the Open Access regime in electronic format.  This means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. By submitting an article to any of the scientific journals of the UTE University, the author or authors accept these conditions.

The UTE applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license to articles in its scientific journals. Under this open access license, as an author you agree that anyone may reuse your article in whole or in part for any purpose, free of charge, including commercial purposes. Anyone can copy, distribute or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are correctly cited. This facilitates freedom of reuse and also ensures that content can be extracted without barriers for research needs.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International (CC BY 3.0).

 

The Enfoque UTE journal guarantees and declares that authors always retain all copyrights and full publishing rights without restrictions [© The Author(s)]. Acknowledgment (BY): Any exploitation of the work is allowed, including a commercial purpose, as well as the creation of derivative works, the distribution of which is also allowed without any restriction.