Journal Information

Title: Enfoque UTE
Copyright: 2023, The Authors
Abbreviated Title: Enfoque UTE
Volume: 14
Issue: 4
ISSN (electronic): 1390-6542
Copyright statement: License (open-access,
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ec/):

Article Information

Date received: 10 August 2023
Date revised: 23 August 2023
Date accepted: 25 August 2023
Publication date: Oct. 2023
Publisher: Universidad UTE (Quito, Ecuador)
Pages: 1-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.988
http://ingenieria.ute.edu.ec/enfoqueute/



Greenhouse Gas emissions from the Abandoned Solid Waste Final Disposal Site of the City of Veracruz, Mexico

Manuel Alberto Susunaga-Miranda1, Benigno Ortiz-Muñiz2, Bertha María Estévez-Garrido3, Rodrigo Manuel Susunaga-Estévez4, Mario Díaz-González5, Olaya Pirene Castellanos-Onorio6


Abstract

The Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz, located to the north of the municipality, was built in the year 2000 and operated according to the regulations in force at the time, for a useful life of 10 years. However, it continued its operation irregularly, collapsing and becoming a controlled final disposal site that was closed by the state environmental authorities in 2019. Through the use of Google Earth satellite images using multicriteria techniques, it was determined that it has an area of 167 228 m² and an accumulated volume of waste of 1 505 052 m³, The Mexican Biogas Model 2.0 was used to estimate the generation of biogas that until the year 2023 was a total of 2 898 064 tons of biogas and with the help of the methodology for the greenhouse effect calculation for urban solid waste. It was determined that in this same period a total of 2 522 057.3 tons of carbon dioxide, 1 162 154.8 tons of methane and 47 115.9 tons of nitrous oxide were emitted. Which represents a total of 47.5 Mt CO2 eq, which shows the importance of minimizing greenhouse gas emissions and their impact on the environment due to global warming of the atmosphere, especially in the coastal ecosystem where the municipality of Veracruz, Mexico is located.

Keywords

Remote Sensing; Mexican Model of Biogas; contaminant migration; GHG; climate change.

Resumen

El relleno sanitario abandonado en la ciudad de Veracruz, ubicado al norte del municipio, fue construido en el año 2000. Operó, para un tiempo de vida útil de 10 años, de acuerdo a la normatividad vigente en la época. Sin embargo, continuó su operación de manera irregular, colapsando y convirtiéndose en un sitio de disposición final controlado que fue clausurado por las autoridades ambientales estatales en el año 2019. Mediante el uso de imágenes satelitales de Google Earth y el uso de técnicas multicriterio se determinó que cuenta con una superficie de 167 228 m² y un volumen acumulado de residuos de 1 505 052 m³. Se utilizó el Modelo Mexicano de Biogás 2.0 para estimar la generación de Biogás, que hasta el año 2023 fue de un total de 2 898 064 toneladas de Biogás. Con la ayuda de la metodología para el cálculo de efecto invernadero por residuos sólidos urbanos se determinó que en este mismo período se emitieron un total de 2 522 057.3 toneladas de dióxido de carbono, 1 162 154.8 toneladas de metano y 47 115.9 toneladas de óxido nitroso, lo que representa un total de 47.5 Mt CO2 eq. Lo dicho evidencia la importancia de minimizar las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero, así como su impacto al ambiente por el calentamiento global de la atmósfera, sobre todo en el ecosistema costero en el que se asienta el municipio de Veracruz, México.

Palabras Clave

Percepción remota; Modelo Mexicano de Biogás; migración de contaminantes; GEI; cambio climático.



I. Introduction

The Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), are generated in households as result of domestic and some commercial activities, and also the cleaning inside of public spaces as schools, streets, parks and gardens [1]. In México according at Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) the waste is composed of their packages and containers of food products, food leftovers, paper, wood, cardboard and a fraction of inorganic materials such as plastic, glass and metals [2]. Worldwide almost two thirds of this heterogeneous mixture are biodegradable since they are generally composed of 50 % cellulose, 15 % lignin, 10 % hemicellulose, 5 % protein, starch, pectin and other soluble sugars whose product of anaerobic digestion generates a series of gases called biogas .

The population increase and the change in domestic activities, particularly in developing countries, has caused the generation of large volumes of waste, exceeding the capacity of municipal authorities for its proper disposal [5]. According to data and estimates from the World Bank by the year 2020, around 2 010 million tons of MWS were generated on our planet, of which it has been calculated that around 66 % of these are not managed in an environmentally safe manner, expecting that by the year 2050 the global amount of waste increases to 3 400 million tons, with a growth close to 70 % [6].

In Mexico, final disposal sites are classified depending on their operation, depending on the degree of control of municipal solid waste such as Sanitary Landfills, Controlled Disposal Sites and Uncontrolled Disposal Sites, and the technical characteristics can range from complex technological processes to avoid environmental contamination to the complete absence of infrastructure [7]. This constitutes a long-term source of contamination, since they impact the environment for years or decades after their closure, abandonment or decommissioning [8].

The final disposal sites of waste they generate and emit biogas [9], which is mainly composed of carbon dioxide (30-45 %), methane (40-65 %) and a variety of gases such as water vapor (1-5 %), hydrogen sulfide (1-3 %), nitrous oxide (1-3 %), ammonia whose emission rate is influenced by factors such as the volume of accumulated waste, organic matter content, moisture, temperature, age of the waste [10], and its stages of operation.

The final waste disposal sites contribute globally with approximately 5 % of the global generation of greenhouse gases (GHG), since these emissions that begin during the operation stages continue for many years after the closure or abandonment of the final disposal site, which represents risks to the environment and to the health of the people who inhabit their environment [9]. It has been calculated that in 2020 methane emissions from sanitary landfills and dumpsites in Mexico generated 24.67 Mt CO2 equivalent, being the second country in Latin America with the highest emission rate of this greenhouse gas from landfills [11].

The sanitary landfill of the city of Veracruz, Mexico, began its operations in 2000. It was built using environmental engineering techniques that through the use of cells with membranes, gas venting wells and leachate lagoon, which would have a useful life of 10 years. However continued in use until 2019 when was closed by the Environmental Attorney of the Government of the State of Veracruz, due to the fact that it had collapsed, covering the entire infrastructure with waste and due to frequent fires [13]. Therefore, at the end of its operation stage, it was already considered a controlled final disposal site [7].

With Geographic Information Systems (GIS) that use remote sensing techniques [14] the final disposal sites and their facilities have been georeferenced [14] and through spatial data [15] its characteristics (topography and vegetal cover) the foregoing is possible using Google Eart satellite images [16]. As Susunaga et al., in 2022 who carried out an investigation using this methodology and determined the characteristics of the uncontrolled final disposal sites of the Sotavento Region in the state of Veracruz, Mexico [13].

Greenhouse gases (GHG) are those that trap heat in the atmosphere and that generate a series of environmental impacts such as global warming and, as a consequence, climate change [7], among these gases are included carbon dioxide, methane and oxide nitrous [11]. Methane and carbon dioxide are the two most important greenhouse gases, although the lifetime of both in the atmosphere is different (12 years for CH4 and between 50 and 200 years for CO2), however the difference lies in the warming power and that methane when reacting in the atmosphere becomes CO2 and water, reinforcing the global warming potential through the greenhouse effect [17].

The emission rate of methane, carbon dioxide a nitrous oxide can be determined using the Mexican Biogas 2.0 model [11]. Which considers the amount of waste accumulated in a year, and that the composition of the gas is 40% methane and 50 % carbon dioxide and assuming that six months after the closure of the site the maximum generation occurs, which decreases as the organic matter is consumed and what occurs one year after the abandonment or closure of the final disposal site [18], and a 1.5 % of emission as nitrous oxide.

The inadequate disposal of Municipal Solid Waste in the uncontrolled abandoned final disposal sites represents an important source of contamination for the surrounding in-habitants, since remediation techniques, waste isolation or monitoring of the same are not generally included [12] [13], the aim of this work was to determine the generation rate of methane and carbon dioxide, which are the greenhouse gases with the highest proportion of biogas from the abandoned disposal site of the City of Veracruz, Mexico in order to demonstrate the importance of the adequate closure of the site to minimize the emission of greenhouse gases and their potential impact on the environment.

II. Material and methods

A. Abandoned Solid Waste Final Disposal Site of the City of Veracruz, Mexico.

The municipality of Veracruz is located in the central part of the State of Veracruz, in the Sotavento Region on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, it has 297 km2 (0.3% of the state territory) and 607 209 inhabitants which represents 7.5 % of the state total and with the municipalities of Boca del Río, Medellín and Alvarado form as a whole the most metropolitan area in the state populated metropolitan area in the State of Veracruz with 939 046 inhabitants [19] (Fig. 1).



Fig. 1. Municipality of Veracruz, Veracruz State, Mexico.


According to the data provided by the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), the climate in the municipality of Veracruz is type A (w2) Warm Subhumid with summer rains, with prevailing winds from the North with a speed of 2 m/sec., average temperature of 29°C and relative humidity of 75 % [19].

The Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the city of Veracruz, was an infrastructure for the disposal of Municipal Solid Waste, closed since December 2019 by the environmental authorities of the Government of the State of Veracruz and which is located north of the municipality of Veracruz [20] in a property in commodatum of the Ex Hacienda Santa Fe of The Administration of the Veracruz National Port System (ASIPONA) at 19°13’56.98”N and 96°1 3’22.11”W (Fig. 2). In a radius of 2 kilometers, borders to the north and west with a wetland area, to the east with to the east with logistics zones and the Renacimiento, Bahía Libre and Condado Valle Dorado neighborhoods, to the southeast with the Chalchihuecan neighborhood, and to south with the Olmeca Industrial Park, and the Geovillas Los Pinos and Colinas de Santa Fe neighborhoods with a population in 2020 of 28 857 inhabitants [19], as shown in Table 1.


Table I. Population Around the Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz

Neighborhoods

Population (2020) inhabitants

Bahía Libre

344

Renacimiento

1780

Condado Valle Dorado

673

Geo Villas Los Pinos

16 855

Colinas de Santa Fé

9205

Total

28 857


Fig. 2. Abandoned Landfill of Municipality of Veracruz, Veracruz State, Mexico and its nearby neighborhoods.

B. Characteristics of the Abandoned Final Disposal Site of the City of Veracruz, Mexico using GIS tools.

The characterization of the abandoned final disposal site, their coverage area and some topographic features was carried out through of Geographic Information Systems through analysis of satellite images with the use of remote sensing techniques [14] using free-form satellite photographs from Google Earth (using available photographs from the years 2002, 2013 and 2023) with a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach (which is an analytical technique that allows the identification of various solutions to a problem, mainly using cartographic variables as starting data.) [16], and using data available in the literature

C. Calculation of accumulated waste the Abandoned Final Disposal Site

The volume of the abandoned disposal site was determined using the formula proposed by Susunaga et al. in 2022 [13], multiplying the area determined with the satellite photographs using Google Earth with the average height that occurs in the abandoned sanitary with, the following formula we used.

Equation 1


Waste Volume = (A)(AH) (1)


Where A is the total area of Abandoned Landfill, AH is the average height of the waste resulted from tracking the cover layers using Google Earth, and to calculate the accumulated tons of waste, the average value of the established volumetric weight of 1 300 kg/m3 we used for compacted waste in Sanitary Landfills and controlled final disposal sites [13].

D. Calculation of the volume of methane, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide based on the biogas generated in the abandoned disposal site by Mexican Model of Biogas 2.0.

For the estimation of the generation of methane and carbon dioxide from the Final Disposal Site, the equations proposed in the Mexican Biogas Model 2.0 will be used, which establishes that 40 % of the biogas produced corresponds to methane and the remaining 50 % corresponds to carbon dioxide and 3 % to nitrous oxide [11]. This method was selected since it is a calculation mechanism approved by the Mexican government in the standard NOM-083-SEMARNAT-2003 and in the project to modify the official Mexican standard NOM-083-SEMARNAT-2003 , which uses a first-order degradation equation which is described in Eq. (2).

Equation 2


(2)


Where QLFG is the maximum biogas flow expected (m3 y-1), i is the increase in time of 1 year (y), n is the total time of disposal of the MSW (y), k is the rate of methane generation (y-1), L0 is the potential generation of methane (m3 t-1), Mi is the mass of waste disposed of in year i, tij is the age j of the mass of waste Mi disposed of in year i (y), MCF is the methane correction factor, and F is the fire adjustment factor.

The values for the methane generation index (k) for the Mexican model of Biogas version 2.0 depend on the time it takes for the waste to degrade, the which can be: DDR Very rapid waste degradation. DRMR, degradation moderately fast waste, DRML, waste degradation moderately slow and DRL waste degradation very slow [11] described in Eq. (3).

Equation 3


(3)


Where % ri is the percentage of waste in each category, vp is the value of k predetermined by the Mexican Biogas Model Version 2.0 in each of the degradation categories [11].

The Methane Generation Potential (L0) is defined as the potentially produced amount of methane (CH4) per unit mass of waste when it degrades, which depends exclusively on them [11] Eq. (4).

Equation 4


(4)


Where MCF is the correction factor for methane, DOC us the fraction of degradable organic carbon, DOCF is the fraction of assimilated degradable organic carbon (theoretically 0.77), F is the fraction of methane in Biogas (assumed 0.5) and 16/12 is a stoichiometric constant [11].

The Degradable Organic Carbon (DOC) content can be calculated by equation 4, this depends on the composition of the waste and varies with the final disposal site, which is obtained by the equation 5 [11].

Equation 5


(5)


A corresponds to the percentages of paper, cardboard and textiles, B is the percentage of garden waste from public parks and gardens, C is the percentage of residues that corresponds to food remains and D is the percentage of residues that corresponds to wood and straw [11].

The Correction Factor for Methane (MFC) is the adjustment of the estimate of Methane generation for the model that considers the anaerobic degradation of the waste and depends on the depth of the final disposal sites and their management practices, for Final Disposal Sites with waste management and a depth greater than 5 meters, the value of the correction is 1 [6].

The value of the Fire Adjustment Factor (F) considers that when a fire occurs at disposal sites in the end, the residues are consumed as fuel, producing ash which do not contribute to the generation of biogas, in case this occurs phenomenon, the percentage of the area must be deducted from the biogas generation impacted by multiplying by the adjustment given the severity of the fire impact (1/3 for low impact, 2/3 for medium impact, and 1 for severe impact) [11].

E. Calculation of the tons of methane and nitrous oxide in tons of CO2 equivalent.

To calculate the tons of methane and nitrous oxide equivalent to tons of carbon dioxide, the formulas proposed by the Institute of Ecology and Climate Change of Mexico in 2020 were used [21], which establishes:

Equation 6


(6)


Were CH4 em is the total methane emissions during the reporting year and PCGCH4 is a Global warming potential of methane.

Equation 7


(7)


Were N2O em is the total nitrous oxide emissions during the reporting year and PCGN2O is a Global warming potential of nitrous oxide.

III. Results and discussion

The Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz was designed, built and operated in accordance with the Official Mexican Standard NOM-083-ECOL-1996, (which was repealed in 2003 and modified to NOM-083-SEMARNAT-2003) that established the conditions that sites destined for the final disposal of municipal solid waste must meet [7]. It began its operation in the year 2000 (figure 3), based on the analysis of satellite images from Google Earth of the years 2002 (), 2007 and 2012 was possible to determine that there were six cells for the deposit of waste with a total area of 119 900 m2 as shown in (Table 2), which were built using geomembrane with the trench method with an approximate depth of two meters.


Table II. Year and Area of Construction of the Cells of the Abandoned Sanitary Landfill in the City Of Veracruz

Cell Number

Year of construction

Area (m²)

Cell 1

2000

27 500

Cell 2

2002

22 500

Cell 3

2004

22 500

Cell 4

2006

37 950

Cell 5

2013

9450

Total area

119 900


At the beginning of its operation, the abandoned sanitary landfill had three disposal cells (cell 1, cell 2, cell 3), which finally in 2006 joined into a single macro cell, after which cell 4 was built in the same year and cell 5 in 2013 (figure 3).


Fig. 3. Abandoned Landfill of Municipality of Veracruz, Veracruz State, Mexico in the year 2002, with cell 1 and cell 2 closed and cell 3 in use.


The Abandoned Landfill in the city of Veracruz was designed for a useful life of 10 years. However, it continued in operation until it collapsed and all the existing infrastructure (biogas wells, leachate lagoon, etc.) was covered with waste, so its final area is 167 228 m² [13]. And in accordance with the NOM-083-SEMARNAT-2003 can be considered as a Controlled Final Disposal Site [7].

According to the documentary information obtained between 2008 and 2015, the municipality of Boca del Río disposed of its waste in the Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz (Table 3). The above due to the closure of the municipal dumpsite in 2010 and in the 2015 the waste from that municipality began to be deposited in the El Guayabo Landfill in Medellín de Bravo, Veracruz [13].


Table III. Daily Tons of Municipal Solid Waste Disposed in Veracruz City Abandoned Landfill, Veracruz, Mexico [13]

Municipality

Tons by day by year

2019

2015

2011

Boca del Río

141.00

135.06

Veracruz

800.00

700.00

600.00

Total Tons

800.00

841.00

735.06


The results of Table 3 show a significant increase in the generation of waste from the municipalities of Boca del Río and Veracruz that were disposed of in the Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz. The above due to the fact that it is the metropolitan area with the highest population growth [19], with rapid urbanization that is counting on high economic progress and standard of living.

Using the data from Table 3, it was possible to determine the total amount of waste disposed of in the Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz (Table 4) by the municipalities of Veracruz (2000-2019) and by the municipality of Boca del Río (2008-2015) in order to use these data in the Mexican Biogas 2.0 model.


Table IV. Disposal of Waste in the Abandoned Landfill of the City of Veracruz Between the Years 2000 and 2019

Period (years)

Veracruz Municipality (Tons)

Boca del Río Municipality (Tons)

Disposal to the Sanitary Landfill

of the City of Veracruz (Tons)

2000 - 2003

529 250

529 250

2004 - 2007

675 250

675 250

2008 - 2011

821 250

193 837

1 015 087

2012 - 2015

967 250

202 575

1 169 825

2016 - 2019

1 153 400

1 153 400

Total

4 146 400

396 412

4 542 812

Comparing the tons of waste disposed of in the Abandoned Landfill of the City of Veracruz calculated in Table 4 at 4 542 812 tons does not coincide with what Susunaga et al. proposed in 2022 [13] (1 956 567 tons). A 57 % reduction can be seen, this is due to the degradation of organic matter, the presence of fires that consume waste and especially the generation of biogas [4].

By using layers of different heights determined from the Google Earth image of August 5, 2023, it can be seen that the shape of the abandoned landfill is like a truncated pyramid, three zones of different heights can be identified (Figure 4).


Fig. 4. Level layers of Abandoned Landfill of Municipality of Veracruz, Veracruz State, Mexico in the year 2023.


The highest height that occurs in the abandoned sanitary landfill of the city of Veracruz is 25 meters from the base of the waste pile, so the average height can be established at 12.5 meters. Using the proposed formula number 5, it is determined that the volume of stored waste is 1 505 052 m³ which is equal to that proposed by Susunaga et al. in 2022 [13].

To determine the weighted methane generation index (k) was based on the Basic Diagnosis for the Integral Management of Waste of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of the Government of Mexico for the year 2021 for the state of Veracruz [3] and the values of k Mexican Biogas Model Version 2.0 for the Southeast Region and Sotavento Region in Veracruz State, tabulated as presented by Susunaga-Miranda in her PhD thesis in Environmental Sciences in 2023 (Table 5) [23].


Table V. Calculation of the Weighted Value of K for the Sotavento Region [23]

Product

Degradation Category

Percentage of MSW

k value

K value modified

Waste Food

DR

36.8

0.300

0.1104

Paper and paperboard

DML

8.2

0.050

0.0041

Gardens Waste

DMR

9.0

0.130

0.0117

Toilet paper

DMR

11.7

0.130

0.0152

Diapers

DR

5.8

0.300

0.0174

Wood

DL

1.0

0.025

0.0003

k ponderated

0.1591


The MCF Methane correction factor for the Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz, which had waste management with a medium height of 12.5 m has a value of 1.0 and the potential for methane generation L0 is 54.5 m³/Ton and the correction value for fires F given the severity of the constant fires that occurred will have a value of 1 [24].

The Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the Municipality of Veracruz has the highest MCF factor that is comparable to other cities coasts such as Acapulco in the state of Guerreo [25], while the methane generation potential (L0) is lower from what was proposed for the southeast region proposed by the same model.

With the generation and disposal of waste in the Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz calculated and tabulated in Table 4 was calculating the Biogas generation from the year 2000 and up to 2031 using the Mexican Biogas 2.0 Model in an excel sheet (Table 6).


Table VI. Calculation of the Biogas Generation at Veracruz City Abandoned Landfill Between Years 2000 and 2031

Period (years)

Biogas (Tons)

2000 -2003

86 087

2004 - 2007

273 188

2008 - 2011

447 118

2012 -2015

649 754

2016 - 2019

784 351

2020 - 2023

657 566

2024 - 2027

350 039

2028 - 2031

185 238

Total

535 277


As can be seen in Table 6, the highest rate of Biogas emissions occurred during the operation stage of the Sanitary Landfill, since it is at this time when the greatest waste degradation occurs. The emissions decrease from the year 2019 after the closure of the site although the Biogas emission can continue for more than 50 years [4]. In this work it has only been calculated until the year 2031, for when it is calculated that the total emission of biogases is of 535 277 tons.

With the data obtained from the Table 6, the generation of tons of greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4 and NO) is calculated from the year 2000 and up to 2031 (Table 7)


Table VII. Calculation of the Ghg Generation at Veracruz City Abandoned Landfill Between Years 2000 and 2031

Period (years)

Carbon Dioxide (Tons)

Methane (Tons)

2000 -2003

74 918.1

34 522.0

1 399.6

2004 - 2007

237 743.2

109 551.2

4 441.4

2008 - 2011

389 107.3

179 299.2

7 269.1

2012 -2015

565 451.9

260 558.2

10 563.5

2016 - 2019

682 585.8

314 533.0

12 751.8

2020 - 2023

572 251.0

263 691.2

10 690.5

2024 - 2027

304 623.2

140 369.2

5 690.8

2028 - 2031

161 204.8

74 282.6

3 011.6

Total

1 376 806.7

2 987 885.4

55 818.3


The generation of GHG were plotted according to the results obtained at Table 7 (Figure 5) for the years 2000 to 2031, although the generation continues for more than 50 years, due to persistent degradation of de organic fraction of waste [26]. However, the Mexican Biogas Model does not establish a change in the composition of biogas, which does occur given that previous studies have shown that methane can represent up to 65 % of emissions and that over time this fraction will diminishing to almost disappearing [27].

Fig. 5. Generation of greenhouse gases from the Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz.


If the graph of Figure 5 is compared with those obtained for the Final Disposal Sites of the Sotavento Region such as the abandoned dumpsite of El Guayabo reported by Susunaga in 2022 [23]. It can be seen that in the case of the Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz there are two turning points due to the increase in generation caused by the disposal of waste from the municipality of Boca de Río from 2008 to 2015.

Finally, with equations 6 and 7 considering the global warming potential for methane at 28 and for nitrous oxide at 265, the equivalent tons of CO2 are calculated [21] (Table 8).


Table VIII. Calculation of the co2 tons eq generation at veracruz city abandoned landfill between years 2000 and 2031

Period (years)

Methane in CO2 Tons eq.

Nitrous Oxide in CO2 Ton eq

2000 -2003

966 615.7

370 890.2

2004 - 2007

3 067 434.1

1 176 973.7

2008 - 2011

5 020 378.1

1 926 317.9

2012 -2015

7 295 629.3

2 799 331.2

2016 - 2019

8 806 925.4

3 379 215.1

2020 - 2023

7 383 353.2

2 832 990.8

2024 - 2027

3 930 338.8

1 508 070.0

2028 - 2031

2 079 912.1

798 061.8

Total

38 550 586.8

14 791 850.8


As can be seen in Table 8, the value of the equivalent Tons of CO2 emitted by the Abandoned Final Disposal Site of the City of Veracruz, due to the emission of methane and nitrous oxide, is much higher than that of carbon dioxide itself. Generated as biogas, this affects the deposit of these gases in the atmosphere causing global warming that affects the climate and coastal ecosystems of which the City of Veracruz is a part [28].

With the data obtained in Tables 7 and 8, it can be established that the emission of greenhouse gases until 2023 is 47 548 112 Tons of CO2 equivalent. Which translates into a significant contribution to climate change and the urban heat island due to what by 2030 the temperature of the Metropolitan Zone of the City of Veracruz will increase according to studies of the Universidad Veracruzana in 0.6°C [29].

IV. Conclusion

Due to the abandonment of the Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz, given an administrative closure by the state environmental authorities, thousands of tons of waste have been deposited without having a mechanism to control biogas emissions resulting from their decomposition. Which causes the generation of Greenhouse Gases that are emitted directly into the atmosphere.

Biogas contributes significantly to the emission of greenhouse gases, however, a series of gases with lower concentrations but with high global warming potential are also emitted also they contribute to a greater extent to climate change, because they have a higher calorific value than carbon dioxide itself.

An abandoned disposal site and to which none of the closure procedures established in the national regulations have been carried out, is a constant source of biogas emission that contributes to the increase in the concentration of greenhouse gases that contributes to climate global change, since the degradation of the organic matter present in the accumulated waste continues for more than 100 years.

The Abandoned Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz contributes to a great extent to climate change due to the generation of greenhouse gases, since it has been shown that due to the increase in the amount of CO2 in the local atmosphere due to the emission of methane and dioxide nitrous and given the proximity to the reef area on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, contributes to the rise in sea temperature and with it to the bleaching of corals in the Veracruz Reef System National Park due to global warming. Likewise this Disposal Site final Uncontrolled abandoned is a participant in the increase in temperature in the metropolitan area of the City of Veracruz, forming what is known as an urban heat island.

It is important that the Federal, State and Municipal authorities contribute to the closure and cleanup of the Abandoned Landfill of the City of Veracruz, since it represents a source of contamination and an environmental liability, that by law are obliged to repair the damage through the techniques established in the Mexican regulations, to minimize the impact of this site due to the generation of greenhouse gases.

1 Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, México (manuel.sm@veracruz.tecnm.mx). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5595-0914

2 Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, México. (benigno.om@veracruz.tecnm.mx). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-9175

3 Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, México. (bertha.eg@veracruz.tecnm.mx). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8543-3520

4 Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico Veracruz, México. (L19020931@veracruz.tecnm.mx). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6570-9307

5 Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico Veracruz, México. (mario.dg@veracruz.tecnm.mx). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-2190

6 Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, México. (olaya.co@veracruz.tecnm.mx). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-2640.

References

[1] A. Iqbal, X. Liu, and G. Chen, “Municipal Solid Waste: Review of Best Practices in Application of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Management Techniques,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 729, 2020 138622, ISSN 0048-9697. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138622.

[2] H. Abdel-Shafy, and M. Mansour, “Solid Waste Issue: Sources, Composition, Disposal, Recycling, and Valorization,” Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, vol. 27 (4), pp. 1275-1290, 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003

[3] SEMARNAT, “Diagnóstico básico para la gestión integral de los residuos,” Secretaría del Medioambiente y Recursos Naturales, Gobierno de México, 2020, Accessed on: August 7, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/554385/DBGIR-15-mayo-2020.pdf

[4] C. Kumar, P. Mishra, N. Singh, and A. Kumar. “Landfill Emissions and Their Impact on the Environment,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 09, (08), 2020. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV9IS080187

[5] A. Agbeshie, R. Adjei, J. Anokye, and A. “Banunle, Municipal Waste Dumpsite: Impact on Soil Properties and Heavy Metal Concentrations, Sunyani, Ghana,” Scientific African, vol. 8, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00390

[6] The World Bank. “Solid Waste Management,” 2020. Accessed on: July 29, 2023, [Online]. Available https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/brief/solid-waste-management

[7] Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-083-SEMARNAT-2003. “Especificaciones de protección ambiental para la selección del sitio, diseño, construcción, operación, monitoreo, clausura y obras complementarias de un sitio de disposición final de residuos sólidos urbanos y de manejo especial,” Diario Oficial de la Federación del 20 de octubre del 2004, https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=658648&fecha=20/10/2004#gsc.tab=0

[8] H. Yadav, P. Kumar, and V.P. Singh. “Hazards from the Municipal Solid Waste Dumpsites: A Review.” In: Singh H., Garg P., and Kaur I. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sustainable Waste Management through Design. ICSWMD 2018. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 21. Springer, Cham. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02707-0_39

[9] C. Zhang, T. Xu, H. Feng, and S. Chen, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Landfills: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no 8, pp. 2282, 2019. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11082282

[10] A. Werkneh, “A Biogas Impurities: Environmental and Health Implications, Removal Technologies and Future Perspectives,” Heliyon. Vol. 8, e10929, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10929

[11] J. Rueda-Avellaneda, P. Rivas-García, R. Gomez-Gonzalez, R. Benitez-Bravo, J. Botello-Álvarez, and S. Tututi-Avila, “Current and Prospective Situation of Municipal Solid Waste Final Disposal in Mexico: A spatio-temporal Evaluation,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, vol. 1, 2021. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2021.100007

[12] A. Morita, N. Pelinson, and E. “Wendland, Persistent Impacts of an Abandoned Non-Sanitary Landfill in its Surroundings”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 192(7), 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08451-7

[13] M. A. Susunaga-Miranda, B. Ortiz-Muñiz, M. del R. Castañeda-Chávez, F. Lango-Reynoso, and M. del C. Hernández-Berriel, “Abandoned Solid Waste Final Disposal Sites in the Sotavento Region of the State of Veracruz, Mexico, using GIS tools”, Enfoque UTE, vol. 13, no. 4, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.853

[14] J. Muralitharan, R. Duraisamy, E. Getahun, Ephrem, and A. Ersulo. “Identification of Suitable Solid Waste Disposal Sites for the Arba Minch Town, Ethiopia, Using Geospatial Technology and AHP Method”, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93936-6_23

[15] M.K. Ayaim, B. Fei-Baffoe, A. Sulemana, K. Miezah, and F. Adams, “Potential Sites For Landfill Development in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Ga South Municipality, Ghana,” Heliyon, vol. 5, Issue 10, , 2019. c https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02537

[16] M. Irfan, B. Houdayer, and H. Shah, “GIS-Based Investigation of Historic Landfill Sites in the Coastal Zones of Wales (UK),” Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, vol. 4, 26 (2019). Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-019-0116-y

[17] S. Thakur and H. Solanki, “Role of Methane in Climate Change and Options for Mitigation-a Brief Review,” IABCD, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 275–281, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.56588/iabcd.v1i2.80

[18] P.E Escamilla-García, “Eficiencia y confiabilidad de modelos de estimación de biogás en rellenos sanitarios,” La Granja. Revista de Ciencias de la Vida, vol. 29 no. 1, pp. 32-44, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.17163/lgr.n29.2019.03

[19] Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, “Panorama sociodemográfico de Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave. Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020”, Accessed on: February 17, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha.html?upc=702825198039

[20] M. A. Susunaga-Miranda, B. M. Estévez-Garrido, B. Ortíz-Muñiz, and R. M. Susunaga-Estévez, “Removal of Heavy Metals (Cr+6, Ni, Zn) from Leachates of the Sanitary Landfill of the City of Veracruz, Mexico with Reactive Permeable Silica Sand Barriers”, Enfoque UTE, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 65-78, 2021. Available: https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.756

[21] Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático INECC, “Metodología para el cálculo de emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero,” 2022 Accessed on: July 17, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/552726/MetodologiaIPCC180520.pdf

[22] M. Ensari-Özay, P. Güzel and E. Can, “Consequence Modelling and Analysis of Methane Explosions: A Preliminary Study on Biogas Stations,” Journal of Advanced Research in Natural and Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 132-144, 2021, doi:10.28979/jarnas.890649: Available: https://doi.org/10.28979/jarnas.890649

[23] M.A. Susunaga-Miranda. “Clausura de los sitios de disposición final no controlados abandonados en la región sotavento del estado de Veracruz, México,” Ph.D. dissertation, Tecnológico Nacional de México/ Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río, Boca del Río, Veracruz, México, 2023.

[24] M. Córdova-Suárez, J. Sosa-Cárdenas, Y. Cifuentes-Suárez and L. Sánchez-Almeida, “Long-Term Evaluation of Biogas Energy Potential Based on the Neuronal Network Approach,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 167, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016705006

[25] Y.A. Salmerón-Gallardo, R.B. Cabrera-Cruz, A.L Juárez-López, M.L. Sampedro-Rosas, J.L. Rosas-Acevedo, J.C. Rolón-Aguilar, and M.A.Valera-Pérez. “Emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero en vertederos de residuos sólidos urbanos Parte B: mitigación de biogás en Acapulco, México,” Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias, pp. 38-49 2017. Accessed on: July 17, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://www.reibci.org/publicados/2017/abr/2200107.pdf

[26] M.A. Leme, P.C. Torres-Mayanga, and D. Lachos-Perez, “Biogas Production from the Landfilled Easily Degradable Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: Mining Strategy for Energy Recovery,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03264-9

[27] V. Paolini, M. Petracchini, L Tomassetti, A. Cecinato, and N. Naja, “Environmental Impact of Biogas: A Short Review of Current Knowledge,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health, vol. 53, no.10, pp. 899-906, 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2018.1459076

[28] M. Marín-Hernández, and G. Athié. El cambio climático en las costas veracruzanas, in A. Tejeda-Martínez, B. Del Valle-Cárdenas, C. Welsh-Rodríguez, C. Ochoa-Martínez, and I. Méndez-Pérez, “Veracruz, una década ante el cambio climático,” Primera edición digital: ISBN: 978-607-8489-70-1, 2020, Editora de Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz https://www.uv.mx/peccuv/files/2020/07/Veracruz-una-decada-ante-el-cambio-climatico.pdf

[29] I. Méndez-Pérez, “Ciudades y cambio climático”, in A. Tejeda-Martínez, B. Del Valle-Cárdenas, C. Welsh-Rodríguez, C. Ochoa-Martínez, and I. Méndez-Pérez, “Veracruz, una década ante el cambio climático,” Primera edición digital: 2020,ISBN: 978-607-8489-70-1, Editora de Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz https://www.uv.mx/peccuv/files/2020/07/Veracruz-una-decada-ante-el-cambio-climatico.pdf