Suggested Methodologies for Evaluation and Selection of Enterprise Architecture Software for Knowledge Digitization

Authors

  • Oswaldo Moscoso-Zea Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial
  • Sergio Lujan-Mora Universidad Alicante

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.v8n1.144

Keywords:

Knowledge Management, Enterprise Architecture, Evaluation of Enterprise Architecture Tools

Abstract

Knowledge Management (KM) is a practice that allows the creation, use, distribution and transfer of knowledge in organizations. Different KM frameworks exist that include business intelligence or enterprise architecture (EA) components for the implementation of KM in organizations. EA tools are used to digitize, relate and visualize the following dimensions of knowledge: organizational structure, business processes, applications and technology. The objective of this paper is to assess the role of EA as a key component in KM and to suggest software evaluation methodologies that can be adapted for the field of EA. For this, an investigation was realized to identify the existing software evaluation methodologies in the market and to filter those that can be adapted for the field of EA. The methodology used for the research was qualitative and exploratory using a case study performed in an international logistic service provider. The case study describes the process done for the selection of the evaluation methodology. Furthermore, it describes the steps for knowledge digitization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Long Range Planning, 44(3), 179–196. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.
Bricknal, R., Darrell, G., Nilsson, H., & Pessi, K. (2011). Enterprise Architecture: Critical Factors affecting modelling and management. Retrieved from http://pdf.aminer.org/000/245/735/enterprise_architecting_critical_problems.pdf
Campbell, H. M. (2006). The role of organizational knowledge management strategies in the quest for business intelligence. 2006 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 231–236.
Comella-Dorda, S., John, D., Lewis, G., Edwin, M., Patricia, O., & Erin, H. (2004). A Process for COTS Software. CMU/SEI-2003-017, (July), 17.
Curado, C. (2006). The knowledge-based view of the firm. Instituto Superior de Economia E Gestao, (1959), 18.
de Vries, M., & van Rensburg, A. (2008). Enterprise Architecture - New business value perspectives. Southafrican Journal of Industrial Engeneering, 19, 1–16.
Edwards, J. (2011). A Process View of Knowledge Management : It Ain’t what you do , it’s the way that you do it. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 297–306.
Forrester Research. (2015). Forrester Wave: Enterprise Architecture Management Suites. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from https://www.forrester.com/report/The+Forrester+Wave+Enterprise+Architecture+Management+Suites+Q3+2015/-/E-RES115345
Gartner Inc. (2013). Gartner IT Glossary. Retrieved March 18, 2013, from http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/enterprise-architecture-ea/
Gartner Inc. (2016). Gartner 2016 Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Architecture Tools. Retrieved August 20, 2016, from http://www.mega.com/en/resource/gartner-2016-magic-quadrant-enterprise-architecture-tools
Iacob, M.-E., Jonkers, H., Quartel, D., Franken, H., & van den Berg, H. (2013). Delivering Enterprise Architecture with TOGAF and Archimate. (BIZZdesign BV, Ed.). Enschede NL.
Ivanov, K. (2009). 10 Definitions of Enterprise Architecture. Retrieved October 6, 2012, from http://www.ariscommunity.com/users/koiv/2009-08-20-10-definitions-enterprise-architecture-which-corresponds-yours
Jadhav, A. S., & Sonar, R. M. (2009). Evaluating and selecting software packages: A review. Information and Software Technology, 51(3), 555–563. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.003
Johnson, P., Lagerstrom, R., Narman, P., & Simonsson, M. (2007). Enterprise architecture analysis with extended influence diagrams. Information Systems Frontiers, 9(2), 163–180.
Karemente, K., Aduwo, J. R., Mugejjera, E., & Lubega, J. (2009). Knowledge Management Frameworks. Strengthening the Role of ICT in Development, 35–57.
Knoll, R., & Schulz, C. (2013). Enterprise Architecture Tool Survey 2013. Wiesbaden. Retrieved from http://www.syracom.de/
Kontio, J., Chen, S., & Limperos, K. (1995). A cots selection method and experiences of its use. In Proceedings of the 20th Software Engineering Workshop (pp. 486–489).
Lankhorst, M. (2009). Enterprise Architecture at Work Modelling Communication and Analysis (2nd ed.). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Matthes, D. (2011). Enterprise Architecture Kompendium. Springer-Verlag.
Matthes, F., Buckl, S., Leitel, J., & Schweda, C. M. (2008). Enterprise Architecture Management Tool Survey 2008.
Morera, D. (2002). COTS Evaluation Using Desmet Methodology {&} Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In M. Oivo & S. Komi-Sirviö (Eds.), 4th International Conference, PROFES 2002 Rovaniemi, Finland, December 9--11 (pp. 485–493). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Moscoso-Zea, O., Luján-Mora, S., Schweimanns, N., & Esquetini, C. (2016). Knowledge Management Framework using Enterprise Architecture and Business Intelligence. 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), 244–249.
Narman, P., Johnson, P., & Nordstrom, L. (2007). Enterprise architecture: A framework supporting system quality analysis. In 11th IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference 130–141
Proper, H., & Lankhorst, M. (2014). Towards essential sensemaking. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, 9(1), 5–21.
Rowley, J. (2000). From learning organisation to knowledge entrepreneur. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 7–15.
Schekkerman, J. (2011). Enterprise Architecture Tool Selection Guide. Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developments.
The Open Group. (2011). TOGAF ® Version 9.1. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/djuv15
Tucker, R., & Debrosse, D. (2003). Enterprise Architecture Roadmap for Modernization. Enterprise Modernization Issue, 7(2).
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-24

How to Cite

Moscoso-Zea, O., & Lujan-Mora, S. (2017). Suggested Methodologies for Evaluation and Selection of Enterprise Architecture Software for Knowledge Digitization. Enfoque UTE, 8(1), pp. 315 – 328. https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.v8n1.144

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): INCISCOS 2016, Special Edition

Section

Miscellaneous

License

The articles and research published by the UTE University are carried out under the Open Access regime in electronic format.  This means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. By submitting an article to any of the scientific journals of the UTE University, the author or authors accept these conditions.

The UTE applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license to articles in its scientific journals. Under this open access license, as an author you agree that anyone may reuse your article in whole or in part for any purpose, free of charge, including commercial purposes. Anyone can copy, distribute or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are correctly cited. This facilitates freedom of reuse and also ensures that content can be extracted without barriers for research needs.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International (CC BY 3.0).

 

The Enfoque UTE journal guarantees and declares that authors always retain all copyrights and full publishing rights without restrictions [© The Author(s)]. Acknowledgment (BY): Any exploitation of the work is allowed, including a commercial purpose, as well as the creation of derivative works, the distribution of which is also allowed without any restriction.