Potential native trees and shrubs for reforestation in the Central Sierra of Ecuador

Authors

  • Jorge Caranqui Aldaz Escuela Superior Politécnica del Chimborazo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.v8n5.184

Keywords:

contaminant, containers, machine, plastic, recycling

Abstract

Within the National Forest Restoration Plan of the Ministry of Environment of Ecuador, the ESPOCH herbarium identified the species used in the Autonomous Parochial Governments of the provinces of Chimborazo, Cotopaxi and Tungurahua. The different institutions sent samples to the Herbarium of the Escuela Superior Politécnica del Chimborazo. We checked that the mentioned species are native and that they correspond to the established zones, for this the catalog of vascular plants was used. We processed the information from which 17 lists of forest species belonging to 21 families, 26 Genres and 49 species were generated. The most frequent species is Alnus acuminata Kunth in all provinces. The species should be generated from the environmental conditions of each of the provinces, and the species to be used in the program should be exclusively native since it is about preserving what little we have, even using known species in the first stage. In addition, not all species can be found in native populations, but only cultivated; this is, therefore, necessary to take into account since the requirements of the species for its development are not the same.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brandbyge, J. and Holm-Nielsen, L. B. (1991). Reforestación en los Andes con especies nativas. CESA. Quito, Ecuador.
Cleef, A.M. 2003. Strong effects of a plantation with Pinus patula on Andean subpáramo vegetation: a case study from Colombia. Biol. Conserv.114:207–21
Farley, K.A. Kelly, E.F. and R.G. Hofstede. (2004). Soil organic carbon and water retention following conversion of grasslands to pine plantations in the Ecuadorian Andes. Ecosystems 7 (7)
Jørgensen, P.M. y S. León-Yánez (Eds.). (1999). Catalogue of the Vascular Plants Ecuador. Missouri Botanical Garden.
Machado, M. & M. Morera. (2000). Nombres comunes de las plantas y los animales de Canarias. Academia Canaria de la lengua, 277.
Ministerio de Ambiente. (2014). Plan Nacional de Reforestación. Documento. Quito, Ecuador.
Missouri Botanical Garden. Trópicos. Base de datos.[Consulta de internet 16 Oct. 2015] http://www.tropicos.org
Ricker, M. Castillo, M. Peña-Ramírez, V. y P. Mendoza-Márquez (2008). Revisión del programa Pro-Árbol 2007, apoyos para la conservación y restauración. México
Suárez, D. 2008. Formación de un corredor de hábitat de un bosque montano alto en un mosaico de páramo en el norte del Ecuador. Ecología Aplicada, 7 (1,2). Departamento Académico de Biología, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, Perú.
Valencia, R. Pitman, N., León-Yánezy S. y P.M. Jørgensen (eds.) 2000. Libro rojo de las plantas endémicas del Ecuador 2000. Herbario QCA, Pontificia Universidad.Católica del Ecuador
van Wesenbeeck, B.K. van Mourik., T. .Duivenvoorden .J. F and A.M. Cleef. (2003). Strong effects of a plantation with Pinus patula on Andean subpáramo vegetation: a case study from Colombia. Biol. Conserv.114:207–21
Vázquez, C., & A. I Batis. (1996). La restauración de la vegetación, árboles exóticos versus árboles nativos. Ciencias, (043).

Published

2017-12-18

How to Cite

Caranqui Aldaz, J. (2017). Potential native trees and shrubs for reforestation in the Central Sierra of Ecuador. Enfoque UTE, 8(5), pp. 103 – 109. https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.v8n5.184

Issue

Section

Miscellaneous