Aircraft Structural Assessments in Data-Limited Environments: A Validated FE Method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.1080

Keywords:

Finite element analysis, Structural integrity, Reduced scale model, Structural idealization, Experimental validation

Abstract

Aircraft operators often modify aircraft configurations, install new equipment, and alter airframes to accommodate this equipment, leading to operations in flight envelopes different from original design profile. These modifications necessitate airframe structural assessments, which typically require comprehensive aircraft design data, often unavailable to operators. This study aims to develop and validate a practical method for finite element analysis (FEA) of aircraft structures in the absence of this detailed design data. Focusing on a case study involving structural analysis of an aircraft wing, this study presents assumptions and idealizations used to develop 2.5D finite element (FE) model of the wing. Fidelity of this model is established by comparing FE analysis results with experimental data. Key validation metrics include reaction forces, load distribution at wing-fuselage attachments, and deformation at reference points on the wing under design load. Comparison between FE analysis and experimental results is carried out to substantiates accuracy of these geometric simplifications and idealizations of load-carrying behaviour of structural members. Therefore, practicality of these idealizations in absence of design data is demonstrated. This study offers a novel approach for structural assessments of aircraft without relying on proprietary design data. The validated method enhances capability of aircraft operators to perform effective structural analyses, thereby extending service life of aircraft with continued airworthiness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. M. Tavares, J. A. Ribeiro, B. A. Ribeiro and P. M. de Castro, “Aircraft Structural Design and Life-Cycle Assessment through Digital Twins,” Designs, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 29, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs8020029

[2] B. Main, L. Molent, R. Singh and S. Barter, “Fatigue Crack Growth Lessons from Thirty-Five years of The Royal Australian Air Force F/A-18 A/B Hornet Aircraft Structural Integrity Program,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 133, no. 7, p. 426, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105426

[3] M. J. Scott, W. J. Verhagen, M. T. Bieber, and P. Marzocca, “A Systematic Literature Review of Predictive Maintenance for Defence Fixed-Wing Aircraft Sustainment and Operations,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 18, p. 7070, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22187070

[4] L.-H. Zhang, W.-J. Li, C. Zhang and S. Wang, “Outsourcing Strategy of an Original Equipment Manufacturer in a Sustainable Supply Chain: Whether and How Should a Contract Manufacturer Encroach?,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 174, no. 3, p. 132, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103132

[5] M. A. Sezal and F. Giumelli, “Technology Transfer and Defence Sector Dynamics: The Case of Netherlands,” European Security, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 558, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2028277

[6] V. Cusati, S. Corcione and V. Memmolo, “Impact of Structural Health Monitoring on Aircraft Operating Costs by Multidisciplinary Analysis,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 20, p. 938, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21206938.

[7] M. Orlovsky, A. Priymak and V. Voytenko, “Concept of Continued Airworthiness of Aircraft at Different Stages of Life Cycle,” Open Information and Computer Integrated Technologies, vol. 12, no. 90, p. 45, 2020.

[8] S. Zhang and M. Mikulich, “Parametric CAD Modelling of Aircraft Wings for FEA Vibration Analysis,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, vol. 9, no. 5, p. 889, 2021.

https://doi.org/ 10.4236/jamp.2021.95060.

[9] A. Bacciaglia, A. Ceruti and A. Liverani, “Surface Smoothing for Topological Optimized 3D Models,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 64, no. 6, p. 3453, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03027-6

[10] A. Mazier, A. Bilger, A. E. Forte, I. Peterlik, J. S. Hale, and S. P. Bordas, “Inverse Deformation Analysis: An Experimental and Numerical Assessment Using the FENICS Project,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 38, no. 5, p. 99, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01597-z

[11] Y. Cai, D. Rajaram and D. N. Mavris, “Simultaneous Aircraft Sizing and Multi-Objective Optimization considering Off-Design Mission Performance during Early Design,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 126, no. 10, p. 662, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107662

[12] A. Bazerghi and J. A. Van Mieghem, “Last Time Buys during Product Rollovers: Manufacturer & Supplier Equilibria,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 33, no. 3, p. 757, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241231859

[13] A. A. Pohya, J. Wehrspohn, R. Meissner, and K. Wicke, “A Modular Framework for the Life Cycle Based Evaluation of Aircraft Technologies, Maintenance Strategies, and Operational Decision Making Using Discrete Event Simulation,” Aerospace, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 187, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8070187.

[14] I. Kabashkin, V. Perekrestov, T. Tyncherov, L. Shoshin and V. Susanin, “Framework for Integration of Health Monitoring Systems in Life Cycle Management for Aviation Sustainability and Cost Efficiency,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 14, p. 154. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146154

[15] J. Lin, “Durability and Damage Tolerance Analysis Methods for Lightweight Aircraft Structures: Review and Prospects,” International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacturing, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 224, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.02.001

[16] P. Korba, S. Al-Rabeei, M. Hovanec, I. Sekelová, and U. Kale, “Structural Design and Material Comparison for Aircraft Wing Box Beam Panel,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 5, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27403

[17] Y. Tian et al., “Optimal Design and Analysis of a Deformable Mechanism for a Redundantly Driven Variable Swept Wing,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 146, no. 10, p. 993, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.108993

[18] L. Félix, A. A. Gomes and A. Suleman, “Topology Optimization of the Internal Structure of An Aircraft Wing Subjected to Self-Weight Load,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1119-1135. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2019.1639691

[19] W. Skarka, R. Kumpati and M. Skarka, “Failure Analysis of a Composite Structural Spar and Rib-to-Skin Joints,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 490-497, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.01.111

[20] N. R. Berger, S. G. Russell and D. N. Mavris, “Preliminary Weight Study Comparing Multi-Rib and Multi-Spar Wing Box Configurations using SPANDSET,” in Scitech 2021 Forum, Reston, VA 2021, vol. 4, no. 8: AIAA, p. 922. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0922

[21] P. V. Kumar, I. R. Raj, M. S. Reddy and N. S. Prasad, “Design and Finite Element Analysis of Aircraft Wing Using Ribs and Spars,” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 3224, 2021.

[22] J. Slota, A. Kubit, T. Trzepieciński, B. Krasowski and J. Varga, “Ultimate Load-Carrying Ability of Rib-Stiffened 2024-T3 And 7075-T6 Aluminium Alloy Panels Under Axial Compression,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 1176, 2021.https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051176

[23] P. Dwivedi, A. N. Siddiquee and S. Maheshwari, “Issues and Requirements for Aluminum Alloys Used In Aircraft Components: State of the Art Review,” Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 212-225 2021. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821221020048

[24] S. De, M. Jrad and R. K. Kapania, “Structural Optimization of Internal Structure of Aircraft Wings with Curvilinear Spars and Ribs,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 707-718 2019. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034818

[25] C. Collier and S. Jones, “Unified Analysis of Aerospace Structures through Implementation of Rapid Tools into a Stress Framework,” in Scitech 2020 forum, Orlando, Florida, 2020, vol. 41, no. 12: AIAA p. 1478. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1478.

[26] J. Kudela and R. Matousek, “Recent Advances and Applications of Surrogate Models for Finite Element Method Computations: A Review,” Soft Computing, vol. 26, no. 24, 13709,13733, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07362-8

[27] A. Haider, “Efficiency Enhancement Techniques in Finite Element Analysis: Navigating Complexity for Agile Design Exploration,” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-02-2024-0053

[28] A. Haider, “Enhancing Transparency and Reproducibility in Finite Element Analysis through Comprehensive Reporting Parameters: A Review,” El-Cezeri Journal.

https://doi.org/ 10.31202/ecjse.1436203

[29] T. V. Kumar, A. W. Basha, M. Pavithra and V. Srilekha, “Static & Dynamic Analysis of a Typical Aircraft Wing Structure Using MSC Nastran,” Int. J. Res. Aeronaut. Mech. Eng, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1-12, 2015.

[30] A. H. Bhutta, “Optimizing Structural Integrity of Fighter Aircraft Wing Stations: a Finite Element Analysis Approach,” Ingenius, vol. 1, no. 32, pp. 90-100, 2024. https://doi.org/10.17163/ings.n32.2024.09

[31] R. Kumar B, “Investigation on Buckling Response of the Aircraft’s Wing Using Finite-Element Method,” Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 18, no. Sup1, pp. S122-S131, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2018.1483467

[32] J. S. M. Ali, W. M. H. Embong and A. Aabid, “Effect of Cut-out Shape on the Stresses in Aircraft Wing Ribs Under Aerodynamic Load,” CFD Letters, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 87-94. 2021. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.13.11.8794

[33] F. Sarka, “Examination of Bolt Connection with Finite Element Method,” in Vehicle and Automotive Engineering: Springer, 2022, pp. 212-222.

[34] J. H. Jang and S. H. Ahn, “FE Modeling Methodology for Load Analysis and Preliminary Sizing of Aircraft Wing Structure,” International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 1, 2019. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1301

[35] S. Fu and N. P. Avdelidis, “Prognostic and Health Management of Critical Aircraft Systems and Components: An Overview,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 19, p. 8124, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198124

[36] W. K. Liu, S. Li and H. S. Park, “Eighty Years of the Finite Element Method: Birth, Evolution, and Future,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 4431-4453, 2022.

https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-981-19-3363-9

[37] D. Arndt et al., “Finite Element Library: Design, Features, And Insights,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 81, no. 22, pp. 407-422, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.022

[38] M. Ainsworth and C. Parker, “Unlocking the Secrets of Locking: Finite Element Analysis in Planar Linear Elasticity,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 395, no. 11, p. 115034, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115034

[39] C. Hagigat, “Elaboration of Degrees of Freedom in NASTRAN/PATRAN by comparing “Rod” and “Beam” Elements,” Journal of Innovative Ideas in Engineering and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 8, 2022.

[40] N. Yang, “Methodology of Aircraft Structural Design Optimisation,” International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, vol. 70, no. 3, p. 145, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2022.130874

[41] A. H. Bhutta, “Appropriate Boundary Condition for Finite Element Analysis of Structural Members Isolated from Global Model,” NED University Journal of Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 61-75, 2021. https://doi.org/10.35453/NEDJR-STMECH-2021-0001.

[42] S. Ereiz, I. Duvnjak and J. F. Jiménez-Alonso, “Review of Finite Element Model Updating Methods for Structural Applications,” Structures, Atlanta, Georgia, 2022, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 684-723. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.041

Downloads

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Haider, A. (2024). Aircraft Structural Assessments in Data-Limited Environments: A Validated FE Method. Enfoque UTE, 15(4), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.1080

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 4 (2024)

Section

Miscellaneous

License

Copyright (c) 2024 The Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

The articles and research published by the UTE University are carried out under the Open Access regime in electronic format.  This means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. By submitting an article to any of the scientific journals of the UTE University, the author or authors accept these conditions.

The UTE applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license to articles in its scientific journals. Under this open access license, as an author you agree that anyone may reuse your article in whole or in part for any purpose, free of charge, including commercial purposes. Anyone can copy, distribute or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are correctly cited. This facilitates freedom of reuse and also ensures that content can be extracted without barriers for research needs.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International (CC BY 3.0).

 

The Enfoque UTE journal guarantees and declares that authors always retain all copyrights and full publishing rights without restrictions [© The Author(s)]. Acknowledgment (BY): Any exploitation of the work is allowed, including a commercial purpose, as well as the creation of derivative works, the distribution of which is also allowed without any restriction.