Enterprise Architecture, an enabler of change and knowledge management
Organizations around the world require a sound process of change management to innovate and remain competitive over time. Change and knowledge management needs to be supported with the right tools to overcome the challenges of transformations and transitions in the business models and processes of diverse organizations. Steering boards can use enterprise architecture (EA) to implement new knowledge management initiatives in their strategic planning. EA allows companies to model the current situation (as-is models) of the organization and the desired future scenarios (to-be models) and to establish road maps to enable adequate transformations. Different frameworks exist in the market that support the management of organizations, for example: Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (COBIT), Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL), quality models such as the one proposed by the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) and systems such as the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) are widely used for the management of business and information technologies (IT). However, EA is not widely used with the other mentioned tools. This paper analyzes EA as a tool for change and knowledge management and compares its functionality with other frameworks in the market. The analysis performed in this paper checks if EA can be used and is compatible with other frameworks. To answer this question, an analysis of the most important processes, good practices, perspectives and tools provided by each framework was performed.
Balanced Scorecard Institute. (2017). What is the Balanced Scorecard? Retrieved February 10, 2019, from https://www.balancedscorecard.org/BSC-Basics/About-the-Balanced-Scorecard
Burns, P., Neutens, M., Newman, D., Power, & Tim. (2009). Building value through enterprise architecture: A global study.
Cáceres, C. E., & Moscoso Zea, O. (2014). Propuesta de un marco de referencia de gestión de organizaciones usando Arquitectura Empresarial. Enfoque UTE, 5(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.v5n4.48
Collins, P., Scruton, R., Gowans, A., & Ackerman, J. S. (2018). Architecture. In Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, inc.
EFQM. (2019). EFQM Model. Retrieved February 10, 2019, from http://www.efqm.es/
Haes, S. de, & Van Grembergen, W. (n.d.). Enterprise governance of information technology : achieving alignment and value, featuring COBIT 5.
IEEE. (2000). IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description for Software-Intensive Systems (IEEE 1471-2000). IEEE.
ISACA. (2012). COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. Rolling Meadows: ISACA.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard–Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review Feb-1992.
Kurniawan, N. B., & Suhardi. (2013). Enterprise Architecture design for ensuring strategic business IT alignment (integrating SAMM with TOGAF 9.1). In 2013 Joint International Conference on Rural Information & Communication Technology and Electric-Vehicle Technology (rICT & ICeV-T) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/rICT-ICeVT.2013.6741505
Lankhorst, M. (2013). Enterprise Architecture at Work - Enterprise Modelling, Communication and Analysis - Second Edition. Springer (Vol. 36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387667-6.00013-0
Moscoso-Zea, O., Luján-Mora, S., Cáceres, C. E., & Schweimanns, N. (2016). Knowledge management framework using enterprise architecture and business intelligence. In 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS) (pp. 244-249).
Niemann, K. D. (2006). From enterprise architecture to IT governance : elements of effective IT management. Vieweg.
Op’t Land, M., Proper, E., Waage, M., Cloo, J., & Steghuis, C. (2009). Enterprise Architecture Creating Value by Informed Governance. Springer-Verlag.
Paredes-Gualtor, J., Moscoso-Zea, O., & Lujan-Mora, S. (2018). The Role of Enterprise Architecture as a Management Tool. In 3rd International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Science (INCISCOS) (pp. 306-311). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INCISCOS.2018.00051
Peña, J. J. S., Vicente, E. F., & Ocaña, A. M. (2010). ITIL, COBIT and EFQM: Can They Work Together? International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics, 4(1), 54–64.
Sunil, B. (2016). Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance. ISACA Journal, 6, 21–27.
The Open Group. (2009). TOGAF Version 9. Van Haren Publishing.
The Open Group. (2019). Leading the development of open, vendor-neutral IT standards and certifications. Retrieved February 21, 2019, from https://www.opengroup.org/
Urbaczewski, L., & Mrdalj, S. (2006). A Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks. Issues in Information Systems, 7(2), 18-23.
Vicente, M., Gama, N., & Silva, M. M. da. (2013). The Value of ITIL in Enterprise Architecture. In 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference EDOC 2013 (pp. 147-152). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2013.24
Will, P. (2007). Innovating with Information Systems. What do most agile firms in the world do? MIT Sloan CISR.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY EC License.