Pollen available during anthesis of Hylocereus undatus flowers





Pitahaya, pollination, fruit trees


Pitahaya (Hylocereus spp) is a fruit that, due to the characteristics of its demand, both for fresh fruit and for industrial consumption, has detonated its development in various countries. However, it presents various self-incompatibility mechanisms that impact productivity. Therefore, the viability of pollen was analyzed during the anthesis (or flowering period)of two white-fleshed H. undatus cultivars, taking pollen samples for 13 hours, from the beginning of the anthesis in the afternoon, until it ends the following day. The method used was staining with tetrazolium salt (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride) or TZ. The results showed that there is no viable pollen at the beginning of the anthesis. At 09:00 pm the viability began to grow slowly and after 12:00 am it doubled and the viability accelerated, marking the highest from 02:00 to 04:00 am. It was possible to observe the consistency of the pollen that begins with a phase I with humid pollen without viability, up to another with lower humidity with low viability (phase II). Phase III observed very granular mealy pollen, easy to handle precisely when the staining readings marked the viability of 93 % to 95 %. Subsequently, the viability decreases until it disappears when the floral structure begins to dehydrate.



Download data is not yet available.


F. Le-Bellec, F. Vaillant, and E. Imbert, “Pitahaya ( Hylocereus spp.): a New Fruit Crop, a market with a Future,” Fruits, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 237-250, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits:2006021.

Y.L. Jiang, Y.Y. Liao, T.S. Lin, C.L. Lee, C.R. Yen, and W.J. Yang, “The Photoperiod-Regulated Bud Formation of Red Pitaya (Hylocereus sp.),” HortScience, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1063–1067, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.47.8.1063.

E. Vh, S. Utomo, Y. Syukri, and T. Redjeki, “Phytochemical Screening and Analysis Polyphenolic.” Aug. 2015.

A. Verona-Ruiz, J. Urcia-Cerna, and L. Paucar-Menacho, “Pitahaya (Hylocereus spp.): Culture, Physicochemical Characteristics, Nutritional Composition, and Bioactive Compounds,” Scientia Agropecuaria, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 439–453, Aug. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.03.16.

F. Gandía-Herrero, J. Escribano, and F. García-Carmona, “Biological Activities of Plant Pigments Betalains,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 937–945, Apr. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.740103.

S. R. M. Ibrahim, G. A. Mohamed, A. I. M. Khedr, M. F. Zayed, and A. A.E. S. El-Kholy, “Genus Hylocereus : Beneficial Phytochemicals, Nutritional Importance, and Biological Relevance-A Review,” Journal of Food Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 2, p. e12491, Apr. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12491.

M. I. Khan, “Plant Betalains: Safety, Antioxidant Activity, Clinical Efficacy, and Bioavailability,”Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 316–330, Mar. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12185.

K. Sudha and D. Baskaran, “Evaluation of Functional Properties of Hylocereus Undatus (White Dragon Fruit),” International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, vol. 7, pp. 451–456, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:89650242

A. Omidizadeh, R. M. Yusof, S. Roohinejad, A. Ismail, M. Z. Abu Bakar, and A. El-Din A. Bekhit, “Anti-Diabetic Activity of Red Pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) fruit,” RSC Advances., vol. 4, no. 108, pp. 62978–62986, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA10789F.

H. D. Tran, C. R. Yen, and Y. K. H. Chen, “Effect of Pollination Method and Pollen Source on Fruit Set and Growth of Red-Peel Pitaya ( Hylocereus spp.) in Taiwan,” Journal of Horticultural Sciences vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 254–258, Jan. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2015.11513179.

J. Lichtenzveig, S. Abbo, A. Nerd, N. Tel-Zur, and Y. Mizrahi, “Cytology and Mating Systems in the Climbing Cacti Hylocereus and Selenicereus,” American Journal of Botany, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1058–1065, Jul. 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2657005.

F. Le Bellec, “Pollinisation et fécondation de Hylocereus undatus et de H. costaricensis à l’île de la Réunion,” Fruits, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 411–422, Nov. 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits:2005003.

F. Bellusci, A. Musacchio, R. Stabile, and G. Pellegrino, “Differences in pollen viability in relation to different deceptive pollination strategies in Mediterranean orchids,” Ann Bot, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 769–774, Nov. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq164.

M. Johana González Vera, T. Zanatta Aumonde, G. Eduardo Meneghello, A. Bicca Noguez Martins, Y. Lezcano Aquino, and P. Peña, “Protocolo de análisis de viabilidad de semillas de chía mediante test de tetrazolio.”

J. Peters, “Tetrazolium Testing Handbook The Tetrazolium Subcommittee of the Association of Official Seed Analysts,” 2000. [Online]. Available: www.aosaseed.com

J. F. França N.,F. C. Krzyzanowski,& N.P O teste de tetrazólio em sementes de soja. Embrapa Soja, Embrapa Soja. EMBRAPA-CNPSo. Documentos, p. 116, 1998.

H. Araméndiz-Tatis, C. Cardona-Ayala, & A.Jarma-Orozco. Eficiencia de dos métodos para evaluar la viabilidad del polen de berenjena (Solanum melongena L. cv. Lila criolla).Revista UDCA Actualidad &Divulgación Científica,16(2)2013.351-358. https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v16.n2.2013.907

J. M. P., “Editorial,” Revista de investigaciones agropecuarias, vol. 11, pp. 0, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=83711301

Y.C. Chu and J.C. Chang, “Heat Stress Leads to Poor Fruiting Mainly Due to Inferior Pollen Viability and Reduces Shoot Photosystem II Efficiency in ‘Da Hong’ Pitaya,” Agronomy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 225, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010225.

H. Zhou, Q. Hu, C. Zhang, S. Hu, Q. Chen, and C. Tang, “High Temperature Reduces the Viability of Pollen from Upland Cotton in China,” Agron J, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 3039-3047, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.03.0150.

J. Biologi, F. Matematika, D. Ilmu, and P. Alam, “NI Kadek Yunita Sari, Eniek Kriswiyanti, Ida Ayu Astarini.” Evaluation of Pollen Viability and Development of White Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britton & Rose), Red Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus (Web.) Britton & Rose) and Super Red Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus costaricensis (Web.) Britton & Rose) After Storage. Jurnal Biologi Udayana. Vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 34-44. 2010. Available: https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1360259

C. Metz, A. Nerd, and Y. Mizrahi, “Viability of Pollen of Two Fruit Crop Cacti of the Genus Hylocereus Is Affected by Temperature and Duration of Storage,” HortScience, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 199–201, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.35.2.199.

M. M. Macha, A. K. Chowdhury, T. Murata, And Y. Yonemoto, “Effect of Artificial Media, Temperature Conditions and Storage Methods on in vitro Germination of Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus undatus Britt & Rose) Pollen,” Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta1957.50.51.

J. G. Ramos Estay, “Polinización natural y artificial en el cultivo de pitahaya,” Universidad de Almería, España, 2018.

J. Li, H. S. South, C. Agricultural, X. Huang, Y. Wang, and Z. Junsheng, “Pollen Germination and Hand Pollination in Pitaya (Hylocereus undatus),” 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.22205/v1.



How to Cite

Del Angel Pérez , A. L. ., Nataren Velazquez, J. ., Megchun Garcia , J. V. ., Martínez Hernández , M. de J. ., & Estrada Lopez , M. A. (2023). Pollen available during anthesis of Hylocereus undatus flowers . Enfoque UTE, 14(4), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.29019/enfoqueute.976